NCELL Tax Case
Brief History of NCELL and ownership
NCELL Axiata
Limited is the Nepal’s first private mobile service provider. Andy Chong was
the key person to start Mero Mobile in
2004. After 4 years, it was acquired by Reynolds Holding Company (Parent
Company – Teliasonera (Norway)) who rebranded it as NCELL in 2010. On April 12, 2016, Axaita (UK) (Parent
company - Axiata Berhad (Malasia)) purchased 100% shares of Reynolds Holding
and indirectly purchased NCELL. After ownership was transferred to Axiata
group, NCELL was transformed into a public limited company. On August 3, 2020,
NCELL's name was changed to "NCELL Axaita Limited."
Since, it’s
establishment, NCELL had ownership structure as 80% foreign investment and 20%
domestic investment (held by Niraj Govinda Shrestha). NCELL had initial paid up
capital of 10 crore, of which 8 crore was foreign investment and 2 crore was
national investment.
Origination of the case/ Ownership Transfer
Legal Provision as per Income Tax Act, 2058 and Double Tax Avoidance Agreement with Norway
· As per Section 35 (a), IRD may re-characterize any arrangement or any part of such arrangement made or attempted to be made as a part of a tax avoidance scheme.
· As per Section 67 (4), If a property located in Nepal or a liability to be borne in Nepal is involved, the source of profit or loss resulting from the disposal of the property or liability will be considered to have originated in Nepal.
· As per Section 95Ka (2), Any gain on disposal of interest in resident entity shall be taxed at the rate of 25% if transfer is made by non- resident entity.
· As per Article 13 of the Double Tax Avoidance Agreement signed between Nepal and Norway, Gains derived by a resident of Contracting State from disposal of shares shall be taxable only in the contracting state of the resident entity.
· As per Section 73 (5) An entity shall not be entitled to enjoy tax exemption or tax deduction facility as per DTAA, in case 50% or more portion of the vested ownership of that entity is owned by natural persons or by the entities in which any natural person has no interest and, for purposes of the agreement, the persons or entities are residents of both Nepal and of the other country party to the agreement.
Key Court Decision and Interpretation
· As Telesonera is a paper company without any employee and office, located in tax heaven island, the considered as an attempt made for tax avoidance.
· More than 50% of underlying ownership of Telesonera (Norway) is held by Telesonaria AB (Sweden), the transaction cannot avail DTAA benefit as per Section 73 (5) of the Income Tax Act, 2058.
· On levying capital gain tax on buyer, Supreme court emphasize that buyer should first inquire about the liabilities (due diligence) of the seller before any purchase. Hence, tax shall be levied on other party of the transaction (buyer, Axiata) since seller Telesonera had already escaped.
Based on the decision and interpretation of supreme court, Large Taxpayers Office (LTO) determined combined tax liability of NCELL, along with Axiata at R.s 62.63 billion and ordered to settle remaining tax liability of 39.06 billion (after deducting previously paid tax) within a week. After the decision, Axiata (UK) filed an application to ICSID (International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes) claiming that the country’s policy of levying capital gain tax is not in accordance with the Bilateral Investment Treaty between Nepal and UK. ICSID issued an order in favor of government of Nepal stating that tax levied by government is based on valid and reasonable ground.

Comments
Post a Comment